Monday, November 30, 2009
From this final paper, I understood it to be somewhat similar to the two sided argument paper from a couple months ago. Having the information from both sides of the argument to explain the pros and cons of each. When I was trying to formulate my argument for this final paper, I was having trouble trying to figure out what the arguments actually were. I was thinking about how to incorporate the rhetorical strategies as much as possible. From my research, I came to the realization that Logos would be my strongest point. I had statistics from my surveys that I passed around and I was pleased with the information that I received. I was still having a problem with my argument. I still don’t think my argument is as solid as I want it to be right now. That is definitely what I need to fix. I did quite a bit of research on my topic and there still doesn’t seem to be enough information to help out my small argument. I feel that my paper is mostly statistics and I’m just talking about what the survey responses are. Maybe I should give myself a little credit, I was able to go in a direction that is pretty solid. My responses that I received are my favorite parts of my research and my paper. I was having fun incorporating the different percentages in my paper. I came to a weak conclusion that because the percentages are so diverse, no 1 preference is the only preference.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment